Dune (Dune Chronicles, #1)Dune by Frank Herbert

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

“Unique among SF novels… I know nothing comparable to it except The Lord of the Rings.” ~Arthur C. Clarke

I’ll begin with what I saw when I first checked what my Goodreads friends had to say about their experience with Dune:

Thank the gods it was Kivayan, my friend Kuba from Poland, who first made it clear to me how important it was that I read Dune, and not just the first book, no, the whole original series, because only then would I be able to witness the genius of Frank Herbert’s grand image (that there was my attempt to express “big picture” in a more fittingly epic way). Thank the gods it was him and not someone else’s opinion which would have left this book under my personal radar, where it had been for many years.

Scratch that. It hadn’t been under my radar. I’d been aware of it since I was little, mainly from video games or perhaps Karina—I just didn’t know exactly what it was about. All this desert, the sandworms… It looked boring. Like something too slow, deep or intricate for me to enjoy. And let me tell you, I wasn’t wrong: if I had dipped my toes in the spicy sand before I’d reached a certain point in my life, I’m confident I wouldn’t have enjoyed it at all. If I had to say, I’d place the point in question around the time I started watching Game of Thrones, playing alt-history games and reading books like The World Without Us or The Dark Tower.

I had started being able to enjoy books like Dune, only I couldn’t make the connection in my head and notice the switch. There was nobody to suddenly come up to me and tell me that the famous, apparently super-influential old SF book I’ve always thought I wouldn’t enjoy, actually involves loads of topics I’d find very appealing: religion, feudal politics, anthropology, psychology, history, ecology and many others, creating a narrative about how narratives, and historical narratives in particular, work, which I expect to discover further in the next books. Well, there was someone: it was Kuba. But if it hadn’t been for him and a few other people like Amberclock who told me about Jodorowsky’s Dune or JMG who often mentions Dune in his Archdruid Report posts, I’d still have the impression that the book is a boring classic, that it’s to SF what perhaps Proust is to modern literature: supremely influential and important, but not enjoyable.

Of course, I was wrong. I may be wrong about Proust, too. But that’s the point: we’re talking about preconceptions here.

What surprises me is that, for it’s alleged importance, very few people I talked to about Dune while reading it even knew of it. For a book that supposedly played an important role in the popularisation of ecology as a word as well as a term and for one which is among the all-time bestsellers of the genre, it is forgotten today by most. I’ll go down a path I don’t think it’s fair to go down on, but how many people know of Tatooine and how many of Arrakis, Dune, the Desert Planet that surely inspired it?

Nevertheless, I found its ambience as a contemporary read very comfortable, even if 50 years have passed since it was written. Water as a super-valuable commodity (with all related cultural conventions) feels right and is played perfectly. Arrakis is majestic. Reading about the Fremen was very interesting and convincing, and I thoroughly enjoyed discovering the book’s unknown world by looking up the juicy neologisms in the appendix (every book like this should have one!)

Not all’s perfect with Dune, don’t get me wrong. Its characters can feel one-sided or shallow, even Paul, who at times comes off superhumany… but then, hey, he’s supposed to be the one, isn’t he? The various political actors and the role of spice in all of this aren’t very clear, but you know, it’s one of these books you’ll read again and next time it’ll make more sense.

But the weak points don’t matter. Dune is a classic, period, and I’m happy for once to have truly enjoyed a classic because it’s a classic, not despite the fact. What can I say? Herbert’s foreword to the book reads:

“to the people whose labors go beyond ideas into the realm of “real materials” — to the dry-land ecologists, wherever they may be, in whatever time they work, this effort at prediction is dedicated in humility and admiration.”

Good man.

View all my reviews

2 thoughts on “REVIEW: DUNE”

  1. Awesome stuff.
    I really want to emphasize how much I enjoy your reviews, I feel by reading them that I learn about you almost as much as I learn about the thing you review.
    Dune is one more “big book” that I haven’t read, I find it quite daunting these days to start such a massive book. If I hadn’t read Lord of the Rings when I was younger, I feel that I would also be too timid to start now. I really enjoyed the movies when I watched them as a kid (The tv miniseries, not even the lynch one /shame), I don’t know if that means that I will find the book boring or uninteresting.
    Also: Damn your superfast reading speed 😀

  2. To tell you the truth, it’s not that massive. To illustrate, A Game of Thrones, that is, A Song of Ice and Fire #1, from what I could discern by some careful eyeballing, is close to twice as long as Dune #1. Books 2 and 3, Dune Messiah and Children of Dune, are much shorter. It’s really not such a great undertaking. But you’re right about Lord of the Rings and our diminishing ability to read long books. I’m becoming more and more mindful of the fact that we’re becoming what Mr. Nicholas Carr would describe as “shallow”, but I have precious few suggestions as to how it could be possible to reverse, or at least fight this effect. Have you been reading any paper books lately, by the way? I’m noticing that long books do seem a bit longer on e-ink than when printed.

    About Lynch’s Dune: they say it’s quite different from the book and that it’s hit-or-miss with the creative direction. I’ll have to have a look.

    Last but not least, like they used to say in my English language school, I appreciate once more your comments on my reviews. That they reveal just as much about the book as about myself is interesting, if not exactly intentional. I can’t guess what people who don’t know me would get from such a writing style, but I suppose it has its merits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *