Review: Fatherland

Fatherland
Fatherland by Robert Harris

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

1964, Berlin, Greater German Empire. A week from Adolf Hitler’s 75th birthday. No-one remembers what Germany was like before the war. What does it matter? The Führer is God, he saved Germany from mortal danger and raised her to become the world’s mightiest. All follow the Leader completely blindly, a Goebbelsian utopia come true. All? Gestapo officer Xavier “Zavi” March is the right man, at the right place, at the right time, and is about to catch a glimpse of the Third Reich’s best kept and most horrible secret…

1964 Nazi Berlin is very convincing. World politics following a Nazi victory in the War also make the mood for this alternate history fittingly gloomy. Albert Speer’s Germania plans for Berlin have all come to pass, including the awe-inspiring Great Hall. An illustration of the book’s timeline’s central Berlin welcomes the reader right at the beginning of the book setting up the climate quite “appropriately”.

Xavier March is a burdened man. His son, a result of his failed marriage, looks to the regime for a father figure instead of him. He’s been working for 10 years as a successful Sturmbannführer but with no promotion. “The Fox”, his work nickname, is a great lead character. He’s surprisingly clever (he’s an investigator and this is a thriller, after all!) but his weaknesses and mistakes are easy to spot throughout the story, grounding him and making him a realistic lead. I was rooting for him all the way.

A thing I liked about Fatherland and Robert Harris’s writing is that it had little details that made it easier to imagine each scene or situation. Insignificant descriptions, like the way some-one breathes or what he or she looks like while walking away, associations March makes with things he notices, hears, touches or smells give the story a much more personal feel, it makes it easier to identify with the –thankfully, unknown for us– circumstances. I could really feel as if I was actually there, as if I was — shudder– March myself .

The plot can be a bit confusing at first, reflecting the lead’s own confusion with the case of the murder by Lake Havel, but as it thickens, as no-one you think could be trusted comes through, as some things become apparent and others come as shocking revelations and turnarounds, everything is made clear and fits well. It took me maybe three weeks to read the first half of the book. I don’t have great experience with police mysteries, but this is more than that. It took me another three days to finish it. This should tell all.

View all my reviews

Review: Why Life Speeds Up As You Get Older: How Memory Shapes our Past

Why Life Speeds Up As You Get Older: How Memory Shapes our Past
Why Life Speeds Up As You Get Older: How Memory Shapes our Past by Douwe Draaisma

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

“You’ll come away with hopefully more questions that you had at the beginning”. It says something along these lines on the back cover on “Why Life Speeds Up As You Get Older: How Memory Shapes our Past”. I didn’t come away with more questions. In fact, I didn’t even get an answer for the title of the book! It’s structure and content is such that it doesn’t analyse the problems at hand in depth or in a way that led to some visible conclusion (I’m one of the people that accepts the conclusion of no conclusion quite alright. Imagine.) Instead, it’s little more than a collection of case studies. Interesting case studies, I have to give Mr. Draaisma that, but ones that do not come very close to trying to tackle the huge chapter of human life that is autobiographical memory. This book could be so much more. Instead, it’s just a text of well-organised and researched memory-related anecdotes that might be interesting by themselves but come across as superficial. A pity; memory, together with time, is one of my favourite topics.

View all my reviews

Review: Anarchy and the End of History

Anarchy and the End of History
Anarchy and the End of History by Michael Ziesing

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

“Just when you thought it was safe to be a anarchist, Gunderloy and Ziesing are at it again, asking questions you thought you had answered, or maybe forgot to ask.
This anthology brings together a collection of essays by people who positively relish a good think – about anarchy, themselves, and so what difference does it make anyway?
More than a series of opinions, Gunderloy and Ziesing offer a dialogue among people who see their common ground as the greatest opportunity offering diversity, individualism and personal freedom.
Who are the anarchist? What, why and how are they in the world today? Maybe you’ll find some answers here. Maybe not. What you will find is an opportunity and a chakllenge to think about it!”

And make me think it did. This book could well be an 101 in Anarchy, but with all the advanced and meaningful debate that is going on about it in a completely different kind of depth, questioning at some points the very foundations of anarchy — see there? Anarchy is not something that is supposed to have “foundations”, yet we speak of it as a concrete idea, just like any other theory out there. You’ll encounter many such examples when reading this book if only because it includes texts by so many people. I wish I could find the original paper the replies to which comprise most of this book just so I could post it here and further spark debate myself. It was published in 1991, on the eve of the information age. 20 years later a highly anarchical World Wide Web is dominating our lives. You’d think a lot must have changed, surely it must have. You might be surprised.

I found this book completely randomly, in a second hand book sale in Aarhus and got it for only 5kr. It might be extremely hard to find, so if you’d like to read it I can lend it to you — yes, whoever you might be, dear reader (BookCrossing might also work well…) It’s a book I’d like to read again though, there’s just so much thought, references and a lot of optimistic ideas distilled in such a small number of pages.

View all my reviews

Review: Machine Man

Machine Man
Machine Man by Max Barry

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This was the first audiobook I ever, uh, heard. It took me 9 hours of listening to Sean Runnette’s good narration over 3 days and it was a unique experience, just walking around while at the same time reading a book, or should I say, following a story. The added layer of voice and sound effects makes it more of a temporal experience than reading the book, with all the good and bad that fact might imply.

Machine Man tells the story of a thirty-something end-all be-all nerd, the kind of person that wanted to be a train when he was a child (yes, be one), loves describing the world with adjectives like “inefficient”, replies to everyting with an “OK” and manages to score zero at any social skills test thrown at him. Give this guy mad engineering skills and an amputated leg and sit back and watch (or read, or listen).

It was very engaging after the third or so chapter, I could see where this was going, but I’d need Z-specs to see how FAR it might go. The plot follows Charlie Newman’s addiction convincingly. I don’t like giving much away when writing my reviews, but I can’t help but applaud the side characters, they are particularly strong here; the ambitious but unappreciated Cassandra Cautery, Lola Shanks (Charlie’s prosthesiologist) and maybe my favourite character in the book, Carl.

Actually, the side characters are so strong they serve to underline Charlie’s single-dimensionality. So comparatively shallow is he that it’s easy to see him merely as the character carrying the plot’s central idea, its gimmick (I don’t like this word). This is perhaps the book’s single biggest problem for me, Charlie’s actions often seem unrealistic and his thoughts completely alien. I cringed all the time when he spoke, or at least when he attempted to. It’s no accident others — even his own self– compare him to a machine even from the start of the book. Are all labcoat-donning specialists so close-minded and awkward? If so, that might explain a lot about science in our world today.

I should however cut Charles Newman’s tormented existence a little slack. It might very well be that Max Barry wanted him to be so exaggeratedly awkward and obsessive-compulsive for comic relief (the book has many dark, uncomfortably funny moments), but also maybe to indirectly comment in his own way on the very foundation of the book’s premise: “biological vs mechanical”, “inefficient vs superior” and perhaps even “mind vs body”, the kind of dualist dilemma that is very natural to follow such what ifs as the one portrayed in Machine Man. What part of us is “us”, and what isn’t “us”? Is the brain more part of us than the rest of our body? Is it, then, that houses our consciousness? These questions are the delicious driving force of the plot and the thinking it provokes.

For example, in a part of the book, Charles says that when people achieve or pull off something (obviously –but exactly because of its obviousness, often overlooked– using their bodies), it’s we, as in our self, our consciousness, that achieved whatever it is that was achieved, the body shrinking into the tool used by the mind/brain it was and has always been, whereas in our failure or when an uncontrolable situation goes bad, we become disassociated with our bodies, they’re Others, and as all typical Others receive the blame for any problem. It reminds me of Heidegger’s take on how Dasein interact with things, the difference between ready-to-hand and present-at-hand. When our body works well, it’s ready-to-hand, it disappears in the background, too obvious to consider, only working as a tool. When it fails to serve us perfectly, its short-comings made obvious, it breaks, it becomes present-at-hand: welcome for optimization, as if it never belonged to us a tall. Machine Man gives food for many such enjoyable parallels.

In fact, Machine Man is one of the most sophisticated cultural items that deal with cyborgs I have encountered and had the pleasure to dive into. It’s definitely filled with all the appropriate nerdy scientific jargon that would satisfy any sci-fi fan (I wonder how many readers will find themselves identifying, even a little bit, with Charles!). But more interistingly, it goes beyond respecting the deep ontological problems that arise from the idea of cyborgs, prosthetics, implants and bio-enhancements, and their implications, if any, for (Cartesian) dualism. It uses these philosophical connotations and gives an interesting and believable story of what meddling with all this might bring about. In other words: it’s not as simple as it looks — it never is — but this time there’s a realistic, (super)human story behind it.

I almost forgot to mention that it has bits of horror and and it’s sprinkled with romance and action and a lot of suspense. You just keep reading, wondering if Max Barry will go all the way. He goes all the way… and then some.

~
I wonder when that had happened, that we had started making better machines than people.

View all my reviews

Review: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: The Trilogy of Four

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: The Trilogy of Four
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: The Trilogy of Four by Douglas Adams

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I was thinking of starting my review with a quote from The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. It would neatly go to display exactly why the probability of this book’s humour and insight into the ways of the universe actually existing are two to the power of two hundred and twenty-six thousand seven hundred and nine to one against. You see, after coming in contact with the universe that sprung out from the genius that was Douglas Adams, your life gets torn into the period before having read H2G2 and after. It shapes your mind, it makes you think about the world in ways you never thought possible — or it makes you realise that this is exactly the way you used to look at the absurdness of the Universe, only life on this mostly harmless planet has made you think in mostly harmless ways yourself.

It’s such a yummy, well-mixed recipe of dead-pan, random, black, so-funny-because-it’s-so-true humours, all served with hearty amounts of insight you can’t help stuffing your face with the whole pot. There’s also a secret ingredient which talks to your philosophy loving side… It leaves you lighter as you laugh with lines so clever, a writer so talented and situations so bizarre you can hardly believe your eyes. It’s the hash brownie of scifi…

The only breaker for me was the characters as well as the plot. Both of them serve as little more than means to present the jokes. I get the meaning of the story is to be bizarre but at some points it went so overboard I had little idea of what was happening. The characters were also inconsistent and to some point interchangeable. Maybe that was Douglas Adams’s intention? I don’t know. But still, four books later, I have no clear view of the plot or of the characters, they’re blurs more than anything else. Which is a shame, for they were means for some pretty unique situations.

I thought that the first and second book were the best, with the third one having the strongest messages but the most confusing situations and plot. “So Long And Thanks For All The Fish” had its moments, especially between Arthur and Fenchurch but it was generally disappointing. I read however that Adams was forced to push through a deadline for the fourth book and was generally disappointed by the end result himself.

The Trilogy of Four is aptly named for my rating standards: I’m giving it a four overall because it didn’t maintain the stellar quality of the first two books throughout the series. I know I’m not finished. This is only my introduction to this extraordinary and hilarious world of not only The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy but Douglas Adams in general. Now I must play the game, read the rest of the books, see or hear the shows…

And to think I may had not read the books in the end because I hated the film…

View all my reviews

Review: Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds

Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds

Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds by Zygmunt Bauman

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Liquid Love is an ambitious book. It tries to tackle the contemporary problem of the “frailty of human bonds” in its microscopic but also trans-social implications. In other words, it studies how capitalist society has made people more reluctant to form close bonds (so that they can easily “buy” new ones with minimum possible pain inflicted), to how cities are built in a way to distance people from each other and disallow strangers from stop being strangers, to how nation-states are treating immigrants (a problem that I have seen in Greece as well as Denmark manifest itself in exactly the same way).

I liked the book but I found it difficult to follow a lot of the time, that’s why I’ve been reading it on and off for more than, ooh, one and a half years? Zygmunt Bauman is very quotable in some parts of the book but when he’s not I found I couldn’t catch his drift at all, I may have read two pages without understanding anything. That may come down to a lack of sophistication on my part; there did seem to be some sort of underlying premise in the four chapters but a lot of the time that premise was sort of rendered irrelevant.

Those said, I must agree with the summary on the back-cover: “It will be of great interest to students and scholars of sociology and in the social sciences and humanities generally, and it will appeal to anyone interested in the changing nature of human relationships.”

View all my reviews

Review: Οι Άμμοι του Χρόνου

Οι Άμμοι του ΧρόνουΟι Άμμοι του Χρόνου by Γιώργος Μπαλάνος

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Αυτό εδώ μου το πρότεινε η μάνα μου, ως ένα καλό έργο το οποίο ήταν μπροστά για την εποχή του, μια μέρα που συζητάγαμε για τον χρόνο και της μίλαγα για το “Making Time” και πόσο με είχε εντυπωσιάσει.

Μυστήριο βιβλίο οι Άμμοι του Χρόνου… Ο Γιώργος Μπαλάνος γράφει ευχάριστα, έχει γνώσεις και άποψη, αλλά πραγματικά είναι ο,τι να’ναι. Μπορεί να σου μιλάει για ένα θέμα και ξαφνικά να σου πετάξει κάτι άσχετο και να ξετυλίξει τον οιρμό του με περίεργο τρόπο. Η γραφή του είναι γεμάτη ειρωνεία και μια λεπτή υπεροπτικότητα η οποία όμως συνήθως ταιριάζει με το θέμα (σαν να λέει σε κάθε σελίδα «δεν ξέρεις τίποτα τελικά για τον χρόνο. Ποιος όμως, τελικά ξέρει; Ούτε οι επιστήμονες, ούτε οι φιλόσοφοι, ούτε εγώ…»)

Ξεκινάει με τις διάφορες ιστορικές φιλοσοφικές και επιστημονικές θεωρήσεις του χρόνου και τις αναλύει, αντικρούει ακόμα με πολλή στιλπνάδα. Και είναι ένα βιβλίο που γράφτηκε πριν σχεδόν 35 χρόνια. Όχι πως έχει αυτό σημασία, απλά βλέπω πως τόσα χρόνια μετά δεν έχουμε κάνει κανένα σοβαρό βήμα μπροστά, ίσα-ίσα έχουμε κάνει μεγαλύτερες παραδοχές στα θέματα που ο Μπαλάνος προσπαθεί να ρίξει λίγο φως. Ίσως επειδή η άμμοι του χρόνου έχουν, για τώρα τουλάχιστον, κάτσει;

Gestalt, βιοκύκλοι, φυσική αθανασία και επιλογή ηλικίας-ρόλου (όπως στην περίπτωση των μελισσών), ταξίδια και «ταξίδια» στον χρόνο με διάφορες μεθόδους, όπως με τρύπες στο (χώρο;-)χρονικό συνεχές και με τήρηση ενός ημερολογίου ονείρων με σκοπό την ενθύμιση περισσότερων ονείρων κι έτσι πιθανόν και κάποιον «προφητικών»… Ο Μπαλάνος υποστηρίζει ότι είναι θέμα χρόνου (pun unintended) πριν βρούμε κάποια μέθοδο για να νικήσουμε τον θάνατο. Έχω φυσικά τις επιφυλάξεις μου αλλά εγείρεται το εξής ενδιαφέρον ερώτημα: Η επιβίωση, το κύριο μας μέλημα, θεωρητικά εξασφαλίζεται με την επίτευξη της αθανασίας. Μετά, τι;

Μετά τι; Αν είχαμε απάντηση σε αυτό το ερώτημα ίσως και να είχαμε περισσότερες απαντήσεις σε άλλα άλυτα θέματα της ανθρωπότητας…

Οι Άμμοι του Χρόνου είναι μπροστά. Το βιβλίο παρουσιάζει μερικές προκλητικές ιδέες για σήμερα, πόσο μάλλον για τα τέλη του ’70 οπότε και γράφτηκε. Μπλέκει την επιστήμη (η οποία από μόνη της προτείνει μερικές εξωπραγματικές ιδέες ως πραγματικές), την φαντασία, την επιστημονική φαντασία και την μετα-επιστήμη (για να μην πω μεταφυσική: έχει περίεργες, προεκτάσεις αυτή η λέξη, ακόμη κι όταν είναι βάσιμη και περιγραφική. Όπως η «συνωμοσία»…) με τρόπο ο οποίος πιάνει το πνεύμα της εποχής μας σχεδόν καλύτερα απ’ότι πριν 35 χρόνια. Με άφησε με ιδέες, ερωτήματα και όρεξη για έρευνα, και αυτό ακριβώς ήθελα. Αν ήταν πιο καθαρογραμμένο και ο Μπαλάνος ήταν λιγότερο φιγουρατζής σε σημεία, όχι πως αυτό δεν είχε και την πλάκα του, το βιβλίο θα ήταν συνολικά καλύτερο.

3,5 ήλιοι

View all my reviews

Review: What on Earth Evolved?

What on Earth Evolved?What on Earth Evolved? by Christopher Lloyd

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Did you know that every bamboo in the world flowers simultaneously once every few years? Had you ever imagined that if you pulverised a sponge the cells would gather together again to form the initial form in a perfect reconstruction? Had it ever occurred to you that, unlike other species like dogs, horses or chickens, people keep cats for no practical reason? Have you ever thought about the relevant speciesist implications? Did you know that elephants mourn their dead and visit elephant graveyards (yes like the ones in The Lion King) to pay their respects? Would you imagine that about 20% of the world’s oxygen comes from a kind of oceanic bacteria? Did you know that smallpox hasn’t really been eradicated — in fact, if unleashed today, it would eradicate a great percentage of the human population? Would you have ever known that most wheat — the basis for a great lot of our food today — cannot even reproduce naturally anymore because humans have bred it to have seeds so large they cannot even leave the ear and thus must be manually assisted?

“What on Earth Evolved?” and its 400-page insight into humanity’s and Earth’s organic history is full of such facts that are definitely going to stick with you. Just ask any of my friends or other people in my social circle if I haven’t been annoying them with jaw-dropping factoids about any of the one hundred species involved in this book, 50 that made their impact before humanity emerged and 50 that affected, and were affected by, us self-proclaimed owners of the Earth throughout our history. This unlikely menagerie has it all: from chickens to the supposed HIV virus, from roses to dragonflies, from cannabis to sharks, from dogs to eucalyptus trees, from ants to bats and from chilli peppers to trilobites.

Just like “What on Earth Happened?”, the sequel promises to change or add to your perspective on things. Humanity’s “special privileges”, our relationship with the rest of the world, the holistic importance of everything there is and all that is no more but once reigned supreme. This book will make you think, it’ll make you look around at life out there through a different eye. This is the stuff children would learn at school in a perfect world (the artistic design in fact, would be deceptively compatible with such a science class at school: minimalism meets cute drawings? Yes!).

This is “On the Origins of Species” on cultural steroids, it’s Darwin for Dummies and I could not mean that in a better way.

View all my reviews

Review: Conspiracy Theories – The Pocket Essential Guide

Conspiracy Theories - The Pocket Essential GuideConspiracy Theories – The Pocket Essential Guide by Robin Ramsay

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

“Conspiracies are real and by no means necessarily the product of a paranoid imagination. If this little book has a single message, this is it. But, as the Kennedy assassination showed, there is not just one big over-arching conspiracy. There are many smaller conspiracies, some of them competing, interlocking, overlapping…”

Insightful little book that shows how conspiracies are run-of-the-mill popular politics. Research into them, however, is undermined by the “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” stereotype which has been fueled by deliberate government disinformation and distraction tactics (such as alien abductions and a great part of the UFO conspiracy paraphilology: who’s going to care about the real and very obvious conspiracies when there’s aliens out to get us?), propaganda and your standard simplistic, absurd, “over-arching” conspiracy theories: Jewish bankers, Illuminati, Masons etc.

View all my reviews

Review: Ένας ψυχολόγος κριτικάρει την Αστρολογία

Ένας ψυχολόγος κριτικάρει την ΑστρολογίαΈνας ψυχολόγος κριτικάρει την Αστρολογία by Γιώργος Πιντέρης

My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Χρήσιμος, αν πλέον πολυπαιγμένος, επιστημονικός σχολιασμός κατά της πρακτικής της Αστρολογίας. Υπάρχει βέβαια η μερίδα των ανθρώπων που δεν αναλύουν τα πάντα με την επιστημονική μέθοδο, καθώς αυτή δεν μπορεί να εξηγήσει επαρκώς τα πάντα. Αν «πιστεύαμε» και συζητάγαμε μόνο για πράγματα τα οποία έχουν μια καθορισμένη και αποδεδιγμένη επιστημονική προσέγγιση τότε δεν θα έπρεπε να μιλάμε για τον χρόνο, τις μεταθανάτιες εμπειρίες, τα όνειρα, την τηλεπάθεια, την ομοιοπαθητική και άλλες «ψευδοεπιστήμες» και «ψευδοοεπιστημονικές θεωρήσεις» (όπως αποκαλούνται από την ίδια την επιστήμη) οι οποίες όμως έχουν μια ανεξερεύνητη και πολύ υπαρκτή σχέση με την ανθρώπινη πραγματικότητα πέρα από τα σχετικά στενά σύνορα της λογικής.

Η Αστρολογία είιναι πάντως ένας ενδιαφέρων κλάδος της ανθρώπινης γνώσης, κουλτούρας και μυστικισμού, είτε αυτή βασίζεται σε κάποιες πραγματικές, άγνωστες ενέργειες είτε είναι απλά ένα ιστορικο-κοινωνικο-θρησκευτικό κατασκεύασμα των οποίων οι πραγματικές επιδράσεις στους ανθρώπους είναι αποτέλεσματα, όπως λέει και το βιβλίο αυτό, αυτοεκπληρούμενων προφητειών. Σε αυτή την περίπτωση, η εξερεύνηση της δύναμης της τρομακτικής δύναμης των αυτοεκπληρούμενων προφητειών και της επιρροής τους στους ανθρώπους θα ήταν σωστό να γινόταν στόχος έρευνας όσων πιστεύουν στην Αστρολογία, αλλά και όσων χρησιμοποιούν την Ψυχολογία για προσωπική αναζήτηση («είμαι όντως ντροπαλός επειδή είμαι Ιχθύς ή έχω πείσει τον εαυτό μου ότι έτσι πρέπει να είμαι, επειδή είμαι Ιχθύς;»)

Αν και η Αστρολογία με συναρπάζει (όπως, άλλωστε, και πολλά μυστικιστικά και μεταφύσικα θέματα) μπορώ να δω με διαύγεια και να συμφωνήσω με αρκετά από τα επιχειρήματα του κ. Πιντέρη. Συχνά βλέπουμε Αστρολόγους με παραπλανητικά επιχειρήματα και δόλιους σκοπούς να κατευθύνουν τους αμαθείς πελάτες τους οι οποίοι τυπικά δεν έχουν καμιά γνώση Αστρονομίας, του είναι και τι δεν είναι ένα ζώδιο και ένας πλανήτης στον ουρανό. Δεν πιστεύω στην «προφητική» Αστρολογία, όμως η γενέθλια Αστρολογία, όσο μυστήρια κι αν φαίνεται, πολλές φορές μου έχει φανή συνεπής με τις ιδιαιτερότητες της προσωπικότητας κάθε ανθρώπου. Από την άλλη, αναρωτιέμαι μήπως κάνω προβολή επειδή ενδόμιχα θέλω να βρω συνδέσεις από τυχαία σχήματα, όπως εμείς οι άνθρωποι τείνουμε να κάνουμε. Ιδιαίτερα ενδιαφέρον μου φάνηκε το κομμάτι του βιβλίου που μίλαγε για το τι επίδραση έχει η Αστρολογία στα παιδιά. Δεδομένου ότι η Ψυχολογία προτείνει πως τα παιδιά εξελίσσονται σε ότι οι γονείς τους λένε πως είναι από όταν είναι μικροί (που ακούει μια ζωή πως είναι τεμπέλης από τους γονείς του τελικά θα το πιστέψει και θα γίνει τεμπέλης), ένας γονέας επιρεασμένος από αστρολογικές ερμηνείες μπορεί ανάλογα να επηρέασει και το παιδί του και εκείνος, ουσιαστικά, να είναι υπεύθυνος για την αυτοεκπληρούμενη προφητεία που θα δημιουργήσει στο παιδί του.

Το βιβλίο, αν και δεν προτείνει τίποτα καινούργιο αν κανείς έχει επαφή με το αντικείμενο και τα όσα λέγονται υπέρ και κατά του, μάλιστα κάποιες φορές η πολεμική του είναι μάλλον άστοχη (γράφτηκε και όταν ήμουν ενός μηνός, πάνω από 22 χρόνια πριν), παραμένει μια χρήσιμη καταγραφή του γιατί η Αστρολογία κατακρίνεται και γιατί κανείς καλύτερα να την αντιμετωπίζει με προσοχή.

View all my reviews