human – Cubilone's Dimension

Review: Ishmael

First of all: I read this in its abridged, audiobook edition. I don’t think if it had been longer my opinion might have been any different but I had to share the fact for what it might be worth for. Maybe it influenced more than it would have the impact of what I perceived the book’s short-comings on me. Maybe it being an audiobook pronounced the book’s obvious shortcomings I detail below.

Why 2 stars:

The main point of Ishmael, the gist, the essence, the core of it I agree with. The agricultural revolution 10,000 years ago changed everything for Homo Sapiens. It began the era of the manipulation of other species, be it floral or faunal, it made people settle down and (as Jean-Jacques Rousseau would have it), “enclose a piece of ground and call it theirs[…]”; it created private ownership. It moved people away from their earlier “primitive communist” ways of living and finally it founded civil society and cities. As one can thus etymologically deduce, this event created what we tend to call civlization today.

All this I heartily agree with. A great deal, if not all, of humanity’s problems and imbalances that are now reaching their logical climaxes were created back then, thousands of years before people had even begun making writing stuff down a habit.

What’s wrong then?

-This book is NOT a novel. Why does it pretend to be one? Why does it have a story? Why does it have a stupid guy as its protagonist that answers to every question with a “yes” or a “no”? Why even a guy in the first place with whom practically no-one out of the book’s target audience would be able to identify? Do we have to read these discussions? I honestly grew tired of them very quickly.

In my opinion the Socratic method doesn’t work for written teachings for it does not let the reader figure their own answers out; they only have to keep reading to “get it”, not to say that they might have different answers than the, frankly, unimaginative ones the student comes up with. At the same time as the students don’t really have to think their answers out at all, the teacher gets all condescending and irritating.

-Wouldn’t you say it’s a failure of a book structure?
-Yes.

–The wise gorilla, the book’s namesake. This wise gorilla, complete with his own needless backstory and apparently symbolising the whole of nature apart from humans, has the ultimate solution. His ultimate solution though depends on every student spreading the message to not one, not two, but one hundred others. Really? A hundred? I don’t even have this many acquaintances I am on speaking terms with, if facebook is to be trusted; how would anyone in this age of pluralism of opinion but monolithicism of practice take such bold and life-changing decisions just by listening to me? To return to the subject of the gorilla: he is the front for the writer himself, but his temper with the arbitrarily dim student is short, his arrogance annoying and his bullheadedness and sporadic refusal to teach, completely out of character. Why the whole blasé air?

A funny personal sidenote: because the gorilla was of the talkative kind, I imagined him as wearing clothes, glasses and a hat. Cultural conditioning much.

TLDR: the book has a valuable message but the presentation takes almost all of the value away from it.

View all my reviews

You Are Not So Smart

Awesome blog that shoots down common misconceptions about our abilities of thought, perception and human social behaviour. We are not so smart, and here’s the proof. Incredible psychology right there! There are so many articles, I can’t choose only a few to post here, so read them all! It was nice waking up early today and going through this blog for the first time while just lying in my warm bed when it’s so cold this time of year. *happy jitter*

Caught off this place: http://thebattleofingolstadt.tumblr.com/

The first photographs ever taken

Stumbled upon (literally, not via StumbeUpon!) it while looking for a place to develop a b/w film in Athens…

1826

The picture below is reputed to be the world’s first photograph. It was taken in 1826 and was developed by French photographer Joseph Nicéphore Niépce. He called this process “heliography” or sun drawing and the entire process took eight hours.

——————

1869

Before the Autochrome process was perfected in France, this photograph of a landscape in Southern France was taken. No, it is not hand-tinted. This is a color-photograph. (Note: It was published in a Time/Life Book entitled “Color” in 1972, “courtesey of George Eastman House, Paulus Lesser.”) You are looking at the birth of color photography seven years after the American Civil War. 130 years ago this view of Angouleme, France, was created by a “subtractive” method. This is the basis for all color photography, even today. It was taken by Louis Ducos du Hauron who proposed the method in 1869. It was not until the 1930’s that this method was perfected for commercial use.

——————-

1838

This is one of the, if not the, oldest known photograph of a human being in existence. It depends on how one defines photograph, but this was taken by Louis Jacques-Mande Daguerre in 1838. (The fellow the daguerreotype was named after.) This is a photo of the Boulevard du Temple in Paris. This is a busy street and there was tons of traffic, but since the exposure was so long, about 15-20 minutes, none of the moving figures can be seen. The only people visible are a guy getting his boots polished and the bootblack. Who was this nameless gentleman or the bootblack? No one knows. I’m sure they never imagined that they had been immortalized, albeit anonymously, by a clever scientist testing his newly discovered method of preserving moments in time.

It was a different world then. The only motorized transportation was the railroad, and even it was in its infancy. Horses and sailing ships were still the primary means of getting around, the typical person probably never travelled more than 50 miles from where they were born. The first Atlantic steamship service started this year though, so the future was on the way. The telegraph had been invented, but the first commercial telegraph operations were a year away. There were commercial semaphore telegraphs operating, so it was possible to send a message over some distance for a price.

The first accurate measurement of the distance to a nearby star was calculated in 1838, the intellectuals were beginning to grasp just how big the universe really was. Though the discovery that there were other galaxies besides our own was still decades away. The first mass produced clocks were flooding markets in England and America, for the first time commoners could have a clock in their homes. Though it would be some decades before time zone was invented, clocks were set to local noon. They were the PCs of their day no doubt. What we would call a modern bicycle was still a year away, the bicycles of the era were propelled by pushing the ground with one’s feet. Gads.

Napoleon was still on everyone’s minds no doubt, the way Hitler is now the demon du jour, having been defeated less than three decades before. Slavery had been abolished in most of the civilized world, with the exception of the USA. In England Queen Victoria’s reign began the year before. I’m sure no one guessed she would reign until 1901, 63 years, the longest reign of any British Monarch. I doubt she or anyone guessed at the changes that would take place in her lifetime. And neither Germany nor Italy existed yet yet, both were a dozen or more smaller independent nations.

Here is a map of Europe in 1815. It would have looked the same in 1838 if I am not mistaken. America was a lot smaller then too, and Texas was an independent nation. In any event, nothing particularly profound about this post. I am just trying to share my love of history in general and old photographs in particular. (I’ve linked to this before, but here again is a lovely site about the history of photography.) Every age thinks it is at the end of history, and at the time, they were.

Puts some perspective into digital photography… Do you think people in 2180 will find anything interesting that exists today in my flickr profile? I wonder if and how today’s technology will be compatible with the mediums of the future…

Big thank you to my sources (in order) and to (CTRL+C)+(CTRL+V):

Idea

1st photo

2nd photo

3rd photo <- Doug’s Darkworld